What is the reason for not tagging it as an area? This seems to mix drawbacks of tagging as area and as a tag on road: - geometry is not mapped - it is complicated to match it to a road - not handled by most of data consumers - highly unusual tagging
Mar 6, 2019, 7:14 PM by pla16...@gmail.com: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 17:49, yo paseopor <> yopaseo...@gmail.com > <mailto:yopaseo...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > >> I mean something like >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675000355 >> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675000355> >> or >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675000354 >> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675000354> >> or >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67500085 >> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675000856> >> > > Which look, in the editor, exactly like the examples I gave links to. So > what's wrong with the > solution I used? I can't remember where I got the idea from, but I probably > found it somewhere > in the wiki or suggested in one of the forums. It handles the situation > well. It's a parking area > which has one side contiguous with the road. Big advantages: it renders and > it shows a P > symbol. What more do you want? > > -- > Paul > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
