Mar 11, 2019, 10:28 PM by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > Le 11.03.19 à 21:36, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > >> Mar 11, 2019, 8:58 PM by >> marc_marc_...@hotmail.com >> <mailto:marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>>> : >> >> Le 11.03.19 à 19:27, Christoph Hormann a écrit : >> >> we map positively what verifiably exists >> >> >> with different imagery, it is possible to verify: >> - that an old one shows trees: old:landcover=trees >> - that a more recent one shows no trees. landcover=xyz landuse=farmland >> >> We do not map what was in the past and disappeared. >> > > who is we ? check taginfo for ex 288k old_name or some lifecycle prefix > if some users keep old name, I see no issue to keep the old cover in > addition to the new one. > old_name is OK - it is for name that is older/outdated but still in use among some people The only case where it is a bit OK is for recently changed features (note="cycleway tagged here is not yet visible on aerial images" or note-"house visible on aerial images is demolished as of 2019-03").
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
