Am 15. März 2019 09:17:31 MEZ schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com>: >Mar 15, 2019, 7:37 AM by grimpeu...@gmail.com: > >> >> >> Am 15. März 2019 00:19:22 MEZ schrieb althio <> >althio.fo...@gmail.com <mailto:althio.fo...@gmail.com>> >: >> >Martin Koppenhoefer <> dieterdre...@gmail.com ><mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> > wrote: >> >>>My primary interest is in specifying the kind of >>>police and facility, a generic amenity=police on top of that does not >>>harm. If the new scheme becomes so widespread that every police station >>>also has a more specific police=* tag, we can still decide to remove >>>the amenity=police tags. >> >> That sounds reasonable. So we'd keep amenity=police as the general >indicator of police facilities >> >Public-facing police facilities. For example police warehouse should >not be tagged with it >(and even if some are tagged this way I think that everybody would >consider it as a tagging >mistake).
I sense dissent here about the future use of amenity=police. Would it be a possible solution to keep amenity=police for public-facing police stations only, but invite mappers on the wiki to nevertheless add police=station, so that in the future the majority of police stations will hopefully also carry the police=station tag? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
