sent from a phone
> On 2. May 2019, at 23:11, Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de> wrote: > > I'd rather propose surface=asphalt asphalt=whisper or the like. > > asphalt:type would also be okay with me. There are more likely 100s of types > of asphalt. I also would not introduce a new surface value, it is still asphalt. Either you see it as an additional property like asphalt:noise=low (thinking of eventually 2-3 values like low/default/noisy), which would open a whole field of asphalt properties (asphalt:drainage, ...) or if „whispering asphalt“ is really considered a type of asphalt on its own, a subtag for an asphalt class: asphalt=whispering or porous... (or the synonymous asphalt:type asphalt_type,...) I would tend to the former asphalt:noise=low (concise and easy to understand) Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging