Indeed. So at a given point, it's the oneway on the way that decides if you can go in, not the route relation. This means oneway tag can be used on the relation. Of course, for vehicles it would be wise to add only ways that are legally allowed in the same direction as the route is intended.
Vr gr Peter Elderson Op vr 3 mei 2019 om 15:55 schreef <o...@hjart.dk>: > cycle.travel appears to try to follow cycle routes as much as possible. > It respects road attributes > > Peter Elderson skrev den 03.05.2019 15:13: > > This one seems to map routes to ways, and it knows the attributes of the > ways. > Are you saying it ignores oneway tags on the individual ways? I wonder, if > I feed it a route that goes over a oneway street and then reverse the > direction, would it allow that in the navigation? Could be dangerous if it > did... > > Vr gr Peter Elderson > > Op vr 3 mei 2019 om 14:55 schreef Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com>: > >> On 03/05/2019 13:36, Peter Elderson wrote: >> > Routers look at the ways, not the routes. >> >> Immediately I can think of at least one major exception for that >> (cycle.travel). I suspect that there are others too. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
