> AFAIK once traffic lights are present markings are not changing anything (and crossing with traffic lights without markings are really rare, I suspect that almost always result of worn-out painting or recent surface reconstruction).
Change anything for whom? Markings and their location/style impact pedestrian safety, even when traffic signals are present. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:23 PM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote: > > > > 24 May 2019, 22:16 by pla16...@gmail.com: > > On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 21:09, <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote: > > crossing=traffic_signals – there are explicit traffic signals that tell > pedestrians when to stop. There are very likely road markings, but even if > not, the absence of road markings, in the presence of actual traffic > signals, is irrelevant for how this crossing operates. > > > Yep. > > That was how I interpreted it all until the Polish contingent threw a > spanner in the works. I'm > waiting for a response to see if it's a big spanner or a little spanner. > > AFAIK once traffic lights are present markings are not changing anything > (and crossing > with traffic lights without markings are really rare, I suspect that > almost always result of worn-out > painting or recent surface reconstruction). > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
