24 May 2019, 22:25 by osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au:
>> Does any of this change in a jurisdiction where there is an implied
>> crossing at every intersection unless posted otherwise?
>>
>
> Such purely implied crossings would be crossing=unmarked, and under the "do
> not map local legislation" rule, I would only map them if they have a
> physical presence (e.g. lowered kerbs).
>
Or where sidewalks are mapped separately from road as highway=footway
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
