Hi all Regarding the particular situation of service vs usage keys, JOSM team wonders if service may be moved to usage https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17770
Don't blame them on "deprecate" word, which should be understood as "discouraged". Question is "Should we keep service in use for destination of water leading in man made waterways?" All the best François Le ven. 31 mai 2019 à 22:41, François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi > > I agree with aqueduct as a system composed of bridges, tunnels, pipes and > canal (not only a bridge crossing a valley). > > Le ven. 31 mai 2019 à 16:10, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > a écrit : > >> I think that in this case, with only >> >> usage=headrace >> waterway=canal >> >> tags even a perfect renderer would have a trouble. >> > > That's right > It misses a structure > Tunnel and bridge can eventually help respectively for underground and > overhead situations. > Another key or value have to be determined to describe overground lining > (and other possibilities) > > If the canal have a constant width, it can be added with width=* referring > to water width at its surface >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
