Thank you two for the elaborated answers I agree that currently many mapping practices split sites and devices. Then the idea should spread as to not get in arguments like the one in the proposal.
Nevertheless I have comments regarding Marc examples : * " bin/shelter/bench=yes on a bus stop for this equipment is present in the area of the bus stop" Shouldn't we put a node inside the bus-stop shelter area to materialize the bin or the bench? * lit=yes on an highway feature properly indicates kind of "process" without be redundant with individual street lights lighting the road This is exactly with I propose for traction substations, mapping process on sites and devices independently. Things are better than I thought. Then, it would be good to amend the 1 feature=1 osm object page with more clear messages (and examples) All of this discussion only cover sites mapped as areas. We can start by stating that a particular device on the ground should get its own object instead of being moved to enclosing building/site/place ? This is not possible to distinguish sites from devices at the moment they are located on a single node. All the best François Le sam. 8 juin 2019 à 01:06, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> a écrit : > Hello, > > Le 07.06.19 à 19:08, François Lacombe a écrit : > > a need to distinguish sites and devices in our tagging. > > making a difference between a characteristic of a site and the device > providing that characteristic is already what we do for many objects. > below are some examples. > I find it quite logical and useful to inform therefore that a site > has a feature with another tag than the device of this feature. > in that sense I find your proposal quite coherent. > I completely disagree with the idea of a comment on the proposal > to create nodes at a random position with the equipment to avoid > the tag for the characteristic. of course, > it's better to be able to map each device separately, but not > by inventing their position and number just to need one less tag > > some exemples : > bin/shelter/bench=yes on a bus stop for this equipment is present > in the area of the bus stop > bar=yes on a POI to say that there is a bar in the area of the POI > lit=yes on a road to say that there are lighting devices nearby. > tactile_paving on the node of a pedestrian crossing to indicate > that there is a tactile_paving at the intersection of the pedestrian > path and the kerb > toilets and toilets:wheelchair on a POI > > Regards, > Marc > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
