On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:30:38PM +0000, marc marc wrote: > Le 09.06.19 à 01:12, Richard a écrit : > > The water level drops a few inches and > > suddenly the "pipe" is no longer water filled > > intermittent=yes/no
that says that sometimes there is no water at all. But not that sometimes it is "pressurised" and sometimes not pressurised. > some industrial installations (I am thinking of an waterway between > retention basins at the Grande-Dixence Dam, part of which is natural) > have been under water since before I was born. > to say that this can no longer be a waterway=pressurised is to say that > it should be divided into 2, a waterway=pressurised-in-a-mandmade-stuff > and a waterway=pressurised-in-a-cave, this kind of micro-mapping > has its place in a subkey, not as a top-level value. my objection is against mapping natural caves with pressurised. If the cave becomes part of an engineered project it is somewhat different. I would be curious about more details and if this is a one in the world situation. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
