On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 08:38 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > DWG has been asked to mediate in a user dispute in Germany where a > local > mapper has chosen to represent a busy four-lane primary highway (two > lanes in each direction, and a double continuous line painted in the > middle which is physically possible but legally not allowed to > cross). > > Other mappers object to this saying that it violates the rule that > there > must be some sort of physical division to allow that form of mapping. > > The original mapper claims that using two separate oneway=yes ways is > clearer and easier, as it does away with the need for turn > restrictions > at junctions. Other mappers claim that the two-separate-way mapping > is > violating rules and that OSM will soon become unusable if everyone > maps > how they want. > > The question is basically two-fold; one, what are the established > standards and rules concerning this situation,
I don't think that there are any rule that would say "legal separation => shared way". I also think that such a rule would lead to an inferior map. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
