Am Fr., 11. Okt. 2019 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb Snusmumriken < snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com>:
> Just to be clear, I'm not advocating that legal separation MUST lead to > way separation. Just that a rule that wouldn't allow it would be a very > bad rule. What makes most sense based upon the ground truth should be > followed. generally, in OSM the ways highway=* represent the carriageway. "legal separations" often are just lane markings, i.e. they do not constitute a carriageway, hence are not to be mapped individually each with their way. We have generally followed this definition, and if we were to change it, we should have good reasons. If the only reason is that we need fewer turn restrictions, then I believe we should find a better workaround than giving up the carriageway=highway definition. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
