11 Oct 2019, 13:04 by snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com:

> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 12:48 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Am Fr., 11. Okt. 2019 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb Snusmumriken <
>> snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com>:
>> > Just to be clear, I'm not advocating that legal separation MUST
>> > lead to
>> > way separation. Just that a rule that wouldn't allow it would be a
>> > very
>> > bad rule. What makes most sense based upon the ground truth should
>> > be
>> > followed.
>>
>>
>>
>> generally, in OSM the ways highway=* represent the carriageway.
>> "legal separations" often are just lane markings, i.e. they do not
>> constitute a carriageway, hence are not to be mapped individually
>> each with their way. We have generally followed this definition,
>>
>
> Who is this 'we' you're speaking in behalf of?
>
>From context it is fairly obvious that 
Martin is describing typical mapping
methods encountered during his OSM
activities.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to