+1 Make the proposal cover all non-road ways (footway, cycleway, path, bridleway, etc)
While we may not imagine a use-case for all of them, it is *far better* to have it standardized so mapping is similar - and when the issue comes up for a mapper in an unexpected situation, it’s there waiting for them. Totally on board for this. I have been using unmarked crossing for years - better to have a proper tag. Javbw > On Nov 19, 2019, at 7:49 AM, Allroads <allroadswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > When there should be a footway=link > then there should also be a > path=link > cycleway=link _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
