On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 04:24, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> wrote: > > First off I like this proposal and agree that it be applied more broadly. > However there is a difference between a motorway=link (and similar) and a > footway=link. A motorway=link is a physical feature unlike a footway=link. A > footway=link is more of an attempt to bridge vector representation of a > footway and how it connects to a vector representation of a road. In reality, > they are adjacent features. If highways=* were drawn as areas, we wouldn't > need a footway link but still need a motorway=link. Then there is the > question of how footway=link should be rendered. I would be happy with a > dashed gray line to indicate that it's just a connection for a router.
You're right, the value "link" isn't optimal as it can lead to confusion with highway=*_link roads. What alternative value should we choose? footway=connection? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
