On Tuesday, 11 February 2020, Volker Schmidt wrote: > OK, you confirm that the "paved is implied" statement in the wiki page is > to be read as "assuming we are in Germany ... paved is implied" and is not > referring to some wiki page that I have not yet detected (that was my > question). > I have no problem with the statement that most residential roads in Germany > are paved, and hence a router can assume that any unpaved residential roads > in Germany have a corresponding tag. > In the UK too paved is implied, I have never used paved. Surface tags such as asphalt, setts, concrete add the detail of what sort of paved.
Phil (trigpoint) > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 17:14, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 11 February 2020, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > > Do we have any agreed implied surface values for the different street > > > categories ? per country? > > > > > > I noticed this phrase > > > "in many cases this is implied by the way itself (for highway=trunk to > > > highway=residential, paved is implied) " > > > on the page > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes/cyclability#Tag_ideas: > > > in the table entry "Surface". > > > > > > I thought there was no such agreement. > > > (I hope to be wrong) > > > > > It is a safe bet in Western Europe, but I am not sure about the rest of > > the world. > > > > Phil (trigpoint) > > -- > > Sent from my Sailfish device > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
