I'm a bit confused by your proposal, but it would seem to me that what you want to do is add crossing_on_demand to the list of values for the key traffic_signals. Is this correct?
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:10 PM <lukas-...@web.de> wrote: > Hi people, > I made a proposal to reform the tagging of those traffic signals, which do > only control a crossing. The proposal has two main messages: First that > crossing=traffic_signals is every time a strict under-tag of > highway=crossing and should not be used on the same node with > highway=traffic_signals, because it makes the scheme of how we tag > crossings (on nodes) inconsistent. The second is that it wants to add the > value traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand as an under-tag of > highway=traffic_signals, to mark for the lane-traffic that there is a > traffic-signals-node whch does only control an "on demand" crossing. These > sets of lane traffic signals often miss a green light because most of the > time there is "default green". Also it would fit into the traffic_signals=* > tagging scheme for specifying the "type" of a traffic signal. > > The link to the proposal is here: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals%3Dcrossing_on_demand > > I'm looking forward to your comments. Please (also) comment on the > proposal's discussion page. > > Yours, Lukas > User Lukas458 > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
