Hi Le ven. 8 mai 2020 à 20:48, Phake Nick <c933...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> motorcycle are not the same type of service as regular taxi. > Then may I ask you why ? I pay a driver to take me where I want to with his vehicle. > The reaso why you get the feeling of people saying "you don't understand" > to you is because you couldn't tell others why your concern is legitimate, > thus making it read like nonsense, even if they might make sense to you, > thought I am still not sure about how the distinction of electric power or > not is going to on the same level as different types of services. > There is a lack of understanding in both sides here because I don't get why having two different amenity values is a benefit. Back in 2009 a wiki contributor explained he's using amenity=taxi + motorcycle=yes. Despite motorcycle=yes can be awkward as it is used as an access tag, the idea to complete taxi service with explicit vehicle definition is useful. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dtaxi#Motorcycles.3F As I assume motorcycle taxi service is the same as taxicab service (change my mind upside), I find convenient to only define extra vehicule types instead of the whole service we already have in amenity=taxi. All the best François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging