On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 14:05, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 2. Jul 2020, at 14:27, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > After doing some digging, that wall is the remains of a gabled wall of a > > ruined cottage, so it wasn't constructed specifically to apply the > > graffito. Which means it's not a monument. So I'll retag it as > > a memorial. > > a monument is an object that you can go into, you cannot enter a graffiti > so in any case this is not a monument for OpenStreetMap. > >From the wiki: "A memorial object, which is especially large (one can go inside, walk on or through it) or high enough..." Those are alternative criteria, not components of a single criterion. Although it might (just) be high enough, that wall was not constructed as part of the memorial. But if it had been constructed as part of the memorial, it might (just) qualify as a monument. Now that I think about it, is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:First_World_war_memorial_-_geograph.org.uk_-_535659.jpg a monument or a memorial? To give an idea of scale, that grey rectangle to its right, near a tree, is a phone box. It's tagged as a memorial, but maybe it's high enough to be a monument. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
