On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 15:47, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/07/2020 15.24, Skyler Hawthorne wrote: > > Sure thing, it's here: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/42.69323/-73.69023 > > ... > > I did not take photos, as I am not comfortable taking pictures of > > peoples' homes, > Google doesn't share your scruples: > https://www.google.com/maps/@42.6927405,-73.6883336,3a,24y,315.41h,90.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGkedvwtT8168p_D1SYKF6Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
The thing that gives me most pause about this photo is that the units seem to share a somewhat complex roof structure. It's difficult to imagine a third-floor addition to one of the units, for example - much of the roof structure would have to be rebuilt. By contrast, in a semi-detached house you can usually add an extra floor on only one side, because even if the roof structure is shared, at least it's symmetrical between units. To me, that suggests these particular units aren't fully independent buildings, and speaks in favour of the tagging with building=terrace for the big outline and building:part=house for individual parts if you want (but I think address tagging with addr:* tags on entrance nodes would be just as valid). (IMHO) --Jarek _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
