I wouldn't tag this as foot=no or access=no. There are many trails in my
area that are clearly animal tracks and seldom used by people - but it
is allowed for people to walk on these and they are sometimes
significant shortcuts so allowing routing over them in some cases would
be good. However, they should be lower priority than real paths.
- Lukas
On 30.11.20 23:06, Paul Allen wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 21:45, Brian M. Sperlongano
<zelonew...@gmail.com <mailto:zelonew...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Note that there is already an animal=* tag for describing things
related to animals, so that probably shouldn't be overridden.
Perhaps a combination of foot=no and animal=yes satisfies what
we're describing?
Or not:highway=path + note=animal trail.
--
Paul
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
