Vào lúc 16:32 2020-11-30, Warin đã viết:
I would not encourage the use of the tag 'animal' as it is a real mess! See taginfo for the variety of values that have no coordination. Example animal=wellness ... for which animals and then the problem of tagging that... terrible.
animal=wellness is a terrific example of conflicting key usage [1] between "It is for ___ animals" [2] and "It is a ___ for animals" [3]. It looks like there's already been an effort to deconflict this usage, with amenity=animal_boarding now pairing with animal_boarding=* and amenity=animal_training with animal_training=*. Meanwhile, access restrictions use freestanding keys like horse=* and dog=*, and the hazard=animal_crossing proposal currently would use hazard:animal=* or hazard:species=*. [4] If these "It is for ___ animals" usages are out of favor, then there would be no conflict in adopting highway=path animal=yes cow=yes or animal=path cow=yes for a cowpath.
Regardless, informal=yes seems especially appropriate for these animal-made paths.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Homonymous_keys [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dog_training [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animals [4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hazard -- m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
