On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:03 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Di., 1. Dez. 2020 um 18:08 Uhr schrieb Brian M. Sperlongano < > zelonew...@gmail.com>: > >> +1, it's unreasonable for mappers to be mind readers about the intent of >> land managers. Either the public is allowed to walk on these paths, or >> they are not. There isn't really a middle ground here. >> > > > There is middle ground. For example in many German nature reserves, you > may enter the reserve, provided you remain on the foot paths. > We are saying the same thing. access=yes for the allowed paths, access=no for anything else. The topic of discussion are unofficial/social/animal paths in places where there are established paths intended for visitors. I suppose if there is a middle ground you could muster access=discouraged, but the documentation says this is for signed roads, not unsigned paths.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
