Keeping the status as de facto, avoids confusion about approval status of the values. I think it's best to pick another battle.
Peter Elderson > Op 11 okt. 2022 om 17:14 heeft martianfreeloader > <martianfreeloa...@posteo.net> het volgende geschreven: > > I've reduced the proposal to the historic=* key itself. No values included > anymore. > >> On 11/10/2022 17:03, Marc_marc wrote: >>> Le 11.10.22 à 16:01, Peter Neale via Tagging a écrit : >>> Many ruins and memorials are "of historic interest" it is true, but that >>> could be tagged as a property ("historic=yes") of the object >>> "man_made=<object_name>" . >> witch main tag for aa ruins with historic interest ? >> it's not a building=* anymore >> and for a historic=archaeological_site ? >> but I agree that several values don't add any information >> historic=building on building=* is the same as historic=yes >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging