Keeping the status as de facto, avoids confusion about approval status of the
values.
I think it's best to pick another battle.
Peter Elderson
> Op 11 okt. 2022 om 17:14 heeft martianfreeloader
> <martianfreeloa...@posteo.net> het volgende geschreven:
>
> I've reduced the proposal to the historic=* key itself. No values included
> anymore.
>
>> On 11/10/2022 17:03, Marc_marc wrote:
>>> Le 11.10.22 à 16:01, Peter Neale via Tagging a écrit :
>>> Many ruins and memorials are "of historic interest" it is true, but that
>>> could be tagged as a property ("historic=yes") of the object
>>> "man_made=<object_name>" .
>> witch main tag for aa ruins with historic interest ?
>> it's not a building=* anymore
>> and for a historic=archaeological_site ?
>> but I agree that several values don't add any information
>> historic=building on building=* is the same as historic=yes
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
