I would say the lighting is slightly outdated. Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 4 nov. 2022 om 17:06 heeft Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonew...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > > I'll offer a well-known example from my country: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Fabulous_Las_Vegas_sign > > It's on the US National Register of Historic Places which should qualify it > as a historic sign. Although I suppose those in Europe would just consider > the sign to be a little old. > >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 11:56 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging >> <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Post_Historic_District >> >> >> Nov 4, 2022, 16:38 by annekadis...@web.de: >> I wasn't aware bicycle parking and sign posts are considered historic now. :P >> >> On 04/11/2022 15:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Nov 4, 2022, 12:59 by annekadis...@web.de: >>> I also noticed that the inscription key is used a lot where it should be >>> description. I think that's the "fault" of the iD editor form for historic >>> features. The inscription field only makes sense for memorials IMHO. >>> >>> I used it for graves, crosses, monuments, amenity = drinking_water, >>> man_made = signpost, >>> amenity = bicycle_parking >>> >>> I see it also being validly used for many other objects. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
