In case of systematic issues caused by iD mappers you can report problem at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema
Possible solution may be presenting also description field or better describing inscription field Nov 4, 2022, 17:36 by annekadis...@web.de: > > The point I was trying to make is that in the iD editor, the field > "inscription" comes up as a default and is mis-used for descriptions. I > would like to see a way to prevent that. > > > Obviously, a signpost has an inscription, but that field maybe comes up > for signpost which I would presume is the primary key. I usually map > signposts/ guideposts in situ rather than in iD, so I don't know off the > top of my head what fields come up for it. > > > Anne > > On 04/11/2022 16:01, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: > >> I'll offer a well-known example from my country: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Fabulous_Las_Vegas_sign >> >> It's on the US National Register of Historic Places which should >> qualify it as a historic sign. Although I suppose those in Europe >> would just consider the sign to be a little old. >> >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 11:56 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>> >> tagging@openstreetmap.org>> > wrote: >> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Post_Historic_District >>> >>> >>> Nov 4, 2022, 16:38 by >>> annekadis...@web.de>>> : >>> >>>> >>>> I wasn't aware bicycle parking and sign posts are >>>> considered historic now. :P >>>> >>>> On 04/11/2022 15:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nov 4, 2022, 12:59 by >>>>> annekadis...@web.de>>>>> : >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I also noticed that the >>>>>> inscription>>>>>> key is used a lot >>>>>> where it should be >>>>>> description>>>>>> . I think >>>>>> that's the "fault" of the iD editor form for historic >>>>>> features. The >>>>>> inscription>>>>>> field only makes sense for >>>>>> memorials IMHO. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I used it for graves, crosses, monuments, >>>>> amenity >>>>> = drinking_water, man_made = signpost, >>>>> amenity = bicycle_parking >>>>> >>>>> I see it also being validly used for >>>>> many other >>>>> objects. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>>>>> >>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org>>>>> >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> >> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
