Hi, another late reply :) You are right, the tagging is a bit unclear when reading through the examples on the Wiki page. Until now I was not aware of this additional "usage" of oneway:bicycle. For me this was just a way to clearly state that the road is, in one way or another, usable in both directions for cyclists.
I am the last editor of the street you used as example and my rationale was: when a lane is on a certain side (cycleway:right/left) it is implicitly a oneway. And cycleway:left=opposite_track implies that the track is a oneway against the normal driving direction. I am in general not sure if it's a good idea to use oneway:bicycle to infer information regarding cycleway:*, since there could be cycleway:left and cycleway:right - should it apply to one of them? or both? A clearer and less ambigous way could be to use this (cycleway:*:oneway is slightly in use - see taginfo): cycleway:right=lane cycleway:right:oneway=yes (optional, a lane is by default unidirectional) cycleway:left=track cycleway:left:oneway=yes It's definitely complex to handle all this information correctly, my shot at this topic is www.radlkarte.at Best, Markus On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Pallai Roland <pall...@magex.hu> wrote: > (I subscribed to the list temporary.) > > 2015-05-10 19:57 GMT+02:00 Pallai Roland <pall...@magex.hu>: >> >> Hi, >> >> 2015-05-03 21:10 GMT+02:00 Markus Straub <markus.straub...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> It's complicated, but I hope this helps a bit. >> >> >> Thanks, it's definitely helped me. I figured out a new marking for unpaved >> cyclepaths. >> >> Now I have ran into a problem with the following way: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8080548 >> >> Based on the wiki page this tagging is doubtful to me, because it's very >> similar to M2d, so cycleway:right=lane + oneway:bicycle=no suggests that >> there is a cycle lane on the right side usable in both directions. I think >> it would be clearer without the oneway:bicycle=no tag (see M1). >> >> You can see the problem on my map: the lane is rendered with thick line >> what means "usable in both directions". >> >> What do you think, is it a tagging issue or should I change my mind? >> >>> >>> P.S.: what's the URL of your cyclemap? I'm interested in your project! >> >> >> http://merretekerjek.hu >> >> The UI language is hungarian only at present. It's a detailed map and >> course creator (route planner) based on the Brouter engine. The map style >> based on osm.org but a lot of bicycle-specific markings are added, too much >> to list in this mail - check out an area where you have local knowledge and >> some will become clear. >> The map style is rather functional than a nice one. My purpose is to >> provide a detailed map fits for everyday use but help OSM editors to catch >> incorrect tagging as well. It might shows more than average joe needs. >> Currently the markings are too fuzzy at some places in Austria for my >> taste, because there is much higher "bicycle facility density" than I was >> used but I'm trying to adapt. >> >> The code isn't on github yet, but that's the way to go, just need some >> time to consolidate the project. >> >> >> Sorry for the late reply but I can pay attention to this project only in >> my spare time. >> >> >>> On 2015-05-03 16:20, Pallai Roland wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm working on a new, detailed web map for cyclists, the coverage has >>>> been extended to Austria yesterday and I have found something that's >>>> unusual in Hungary (where I started): unpaved cycleways. See: >>>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/98p >>>> >>>> Can you tell me are those official cycleways marked with a traffic sign >>>> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:120px-Zeichen_237.svg.png> in >>>> Austria? Do the same rules apply to those as to the common cycleways in >>>> the city? Are those designated for cyclists? >>>> >>>> >>>> In Hungary we've cycle routes on unpaved roads of course but that's >>>> never a cycleway, just a cycle route or recommended way for cyclists >>>> (traffic sign <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:KRESZ-KPU.png>) >>>> on an unpaved highway, or an unpaved highway suitable for cycling (but >>>> not designated for cyclists). If you found some with overpass that's >>>> just incorrect labeling. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at