> I've looked back through the logs, found the one discussion, noted that > it was basically a 4-3 split of contributors and since every discussion > on it has been "we discussed it and decided this". Hardly a consensus > in my mind.
Since you made the effort to go back through the logs, and re-read the discussion that took place then, I'm surprised you would reach the conclusion that peoples position was solely related to effort. I disagree that there hasn't been consensus on its use. There always have been differences of opioion, but as you say, most people have been happy to accept that it is the way it is. That is consensus. I feel the approach you are taking is wrong. There are reasonable arguments to use a mini-roundabout tag in Australia where it is currently being used. If you want to convince people to not use it, and to map using junction, take the time to understand and address those arguments, and convince people that the best way is the way you are suggesting. Don't dismiss its proponents as lazy, or worse still as disruptive. Many of its these people have been valuable contributors to getting the map done. Ian. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au