On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Ian Sergeant wrote: > > I plan on submitting a proposal for the roundabout tag, where you > > can add it to a node like a mini_roundabout, for use in simple > > suburban type roundabouts. Something like junction: > > inner_width=3mcould specify the island size, making it possible for > > pretty rendering. Weird intersecting ways or large roundabouts would > > have to continue as is. > > Oddly enough, these seems almost completely contrary to what Darrin is > arguing, and aligns well with that I would like to see happen. I really > don't care whether the tag is called mini_roundabout or something else, I > think the junction is best represented by a single node. Darrin believes > that it is better represented by have a loop.
I'm trying to work out a way through the maze, and produce an answer which will be acceptable to all parties. I'm trying to understand Darrin's arguments, but when I have tried to summarise my understanding, he has rejected my summary. I was thinking of another node descriptor, which was "highway=roundabout", as distinct from the "junction=roundabout" which is applied to a loop way. There is certainly evidence of a variety of mappers using a node descriptor for roundabouts in Australia, and my understanding was that Darrin's biggest bugbear was mini_roundabout. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au