Liz <ed...@billiau.net> wrote: > I've thought about this a bit more, and its not the best idea to be using > roads as park or other area perimeters.
I agree. But... (there's always a but...) > It sure would make it fast to put this stuff in initially, but any subsequent > alterations - say changes in the road itself - mean big alterations to be > made by the next mapper. What about areas that really are defined by the road? I came across a validation error for a parking area recently where the parking area shared a way with the road that was one boundary of the parking area. It's at the centre of the map here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.4656&lon=151.43433&zoom=17&layers=B000FTF I think in this specific example the parking area is small enough that it should just be a single node, but I can see larger areas existing someplace. -- Sam Couter | mailto:s...@couter.id.au OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
