--- On Mon, 17/8/09, BlueMM <bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com> wrote: > But my point was if they *are* consistent (same shield > design), why specify > state?
Consistent to what? Some states have gone to a alphanumeric system, some use the old NH shields and those with the alphanumeric system have different shields between states. http://www.routemarkers.com/Oceania/ > I don't know if any are consistent right around Australia, > but I suggest we > mention drop the state for know national shields. >From what I've seen there is no consistency, even when they change to the >alphanumeric system they still differ in the shields they use :) > I can think of a potentially hundreds of routes which are > for eg. C123 and > called TownA-TownB Road. > It could be that is far more prevalent that needing the > separate ref/name > relations. Just trying to keep it simple, anyone else got > ideas/opinions? I've only been talking about highways, not roads, I haven't considered what to do about roads, same thing as streets I suppose. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
