On 22 February 2010 17:43, Liz <ed...@billiau.net> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, David Murn wrote: >> No, what Im say(ing) is, Im unsure if theres a privacy issue, and asking >> for others opinions or if theres any precedents to follow (other than >> the court cases brought against google for invasion of privacy). >> >> If I was saying we shouldnt be doing street addressing, why would I have >> said 'I can see both sides, but am interested in others opinions'? >> > I'm concerned about marking what are actual terrorist targets (not the media > frenzy type terrorists who are at airports) > telephone exchange, communications tower, power lines > things not usually well mapped in commercial offerings but which if destroyed > cause havoc without large numbers of fatalities
A Perth street map I have has the path of the Dampier-Bunbury gas pipeline mapped. Now that's a clear target and isn't even readily visible in real life, but there doesn't seem to be a problem with it being mapped. So I don't think it's something we need to worry about. The locations of telephone exchanges are widely available, people use them to work out how fast their ADSL should be. James Andrewartha. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
