On 31 January 2011 02:26, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > You aren't addressing the core question. "Given that the new imagery > plugin has made it much simpler to accidentally infringe, is a URL > blacklist a suitable way to raise that barrier closer to where it was > a few weeks ago?"
However David's point, and Anthony and mine and Dirks where, why should JOSM only support things that are applicable to OSM-F? Perhaps some other community out there doesn't care about Google's terms and conditions, why should it come down to baby sitting people? _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
