On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 January 2011 02:26, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: >> You aren't addressing the core question. "Given that the new imagery >> plugin has made it much simpler to accidentally infringe, is a URL >> blacklist a suitable way to raise that barrier closer to where it was >> a few weeks ago?" > > However David's point, and Anthony and mine and Dirks where, why > should JOSM only support things that are applicable to OSM-F? > > Perhaps some other community out there doesn't care about Google's > terms and conditions, why should it come down to baby sitting people?
For JOSM, the Java OpenStreetMap editor? Really? That's what you are asking? from josm.openstreetmap.de "Java OpenStreetMap Editor ¶ /svn/trunk/images/logo.png JOSM is an editor for OpenStreetMap (OSM) written in Java 1.6. " Which seems to declare the core interest of the JOSM project pretty clearly. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
