> No. It's much closer to a Wikipedia transition from GNU FDL to > CC-By-SA. OpenStreetMap is moving to a license that is much better > suited to data, while maintaining the Share Alike and Attribution > aspects. Is this a deliberate troll, or just clueless ?
On 24 April 2011 20:48, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:27 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 24 April 2011 22:18, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir <maxi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> As was said on talk, it seems pretty absurd to be moving an open >>> mapping project in 2011 such that it is shutting out Ordinance Survey >>> and NearMap when all they ask for is attribution. >> >> It's a GPL v BSD type issue, some people want share a like, others >> think a BSD/PD style license is the way to go, > > No. It's much closer to a Wikipedia transition from GNU FDL to > CC-By-SA. OpenStreetMap is moving to a license that is much better > suited to data, while maintaining the Share Alike and Attribution > aspects. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
