On 11 July 2011 19:29, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > It's not using it under a licence other than CC-BY-SA. A "Collective > Database" or "Collective Work" means that the ODbL part of it is under ODbL > and the CC-BY-SA part is under CC-BY-SA. This is the very first clause (1a) > of CC-BY-SA. > > In Australian legal terms, the two databases are "underlying works" and so > retain their own rights. The two together are a "compilation" (albeit one > that is so simple it doesn't attract any additional copyright in itself), > and therefore users need permission of the rights-holders in the underlying > works. This permission has already been granted in the two open content > licences used: the "Collective Work" permission of CC-BY-SA and the > "Collective Database" permission of ODbL.
It's my understanding that CC-by-SA is only compatible with itself, and it's definitely not compatible with the ODBL because the ODBL doesn't require any sort of minimum attribution or share a like clause on produced works. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
