On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, 80n <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Grant Slater < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 27 September 2011 12:09, 80n <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Thank you, Andrew. >> > >> > I wonder if Grant received a similar answer but interpreted it in a >> > different way. Grant? >> > >> >> Hi 80n, yes the responses will be forthcoming. We are waiting on some >> further clarifications. LWG also now only meet fortnightly. >> > > Grant > If you have "explicit special permission" why do you seek further > clarification? Was it not explicit enough? > > Perhaps you'd be kind enough to publish the text of the permission you > have received. We can then see for ourselves. >
Grant I'm still waiting for a response to this. Is there some reason why you cannot publish what you have? We've seen how wires get crossed with Richard's attempt to transcribe a message. Anything less than a verbatim copy of what you received has the potential to lead to confusion and misunderstand. 80n
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
