On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Ben Kelley <ben.kel...@gmail.com> wrote: > With no evidence on the ground (signs, road markings, shared paths etc) I > generally don't mark it as a route, even if some other map says it is. I > considered if routes that appear on council maps, but with no infrastructure > or signage are "proposed", but mostly I don't mark these at all.
What about if there are signs but no bike paths etc? Ian and I differed on that one. > For councils that don't have their own well developed network of routes, I > agree that sometimes you need to do some interpretation. I would not mark a > street as lcn simply because it might be a good way to ride though. What if there were two signed routes near each other, but there wasn't, strictly speaking, a signed route between the two? Let's say 200m. Steve _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au