On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 08:55, Tom Brennan <webs...@ozultimate.com> wrote:
> > This is an example of a residential driveway (highway=service + > service=driveway) that I would add access=private to. Yep. I agree with your comment about only the section inside the property > actually being > private, but that distinction really only becomes important once > footpaths are more frequently mapped as highway=footway + footway=sidewalk > Personally, I don't bother splitting them. Strictly speaking, nobody is allowed to turn into your household driveway & park there, so I consider that the whole thing would be private? This is an example of an industrial complex that has driveways (or > access roads?) leading to numerous small businesses. Currently > highway=service, no access or service tags. Access is not clear to me > I'd call it =driveway + access=yes, as customers have to get to those businesses This is an example of an industrial area driveway (highway=service + > service=driveway) that I would add access=private to (local knowledge). > Is it only PO staff who drive in there? If yes, then =private is good, if other couriers / deliveries also come in, then possibly =permit? This is an example of an industrial complex that has a mix (6 ways > total) of highway=service, highway=service + service=parking_aisle and > highway=service + service=driveway(!). Yep, that looks about right, once again probably access=yes. You could also include another driveway going up to the multi-story carpark, & a parking-aisle on it's roof! Access on that one would depend on signage though? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-33.81513/151.19230 Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
