That would be logical, but motor bikes are classified as a vehicle and are the only ones using this 'path' which ends up being mapped as a track via the satellite picture.
Path does not imply motor bikes. Legally it is allowed to be used as a path, but motor vehicles are not allowed. The motor bike tracks would be difficult to use as a walking track and also for a bicycle. If the tracks were reclassified as a path, it would at least show something that is on the ground plus also imply that it is not allowed for vehicles. What if the motor bike track is legal, how would you then classify the track if it is not wide enough for any car? Thanks Ian From: ianst...@iinet.net.au <ianst...@iinet.net.au> Sent: Saturday, 30 October 2021 11:11 AM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] "Removing closed or illegal trails." (in Nerang National Park) I've always mapped a track that's not wide-enough for a vehicle as a path. Ian Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 10:19:36 +1100 From: "EON4wd" <i...@eon4wd.com.au <mailto:i...@eon4wd.com.au> > To: <talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [talk-au] "Removing closed or illegal trails." (in Nerang National Park) Message-ID: <000001d7cd1b$70f144b0$52d3ce10$@eon4wd.com.au <mailto:000001d7cd1b$70f144b0$52d3ce10$@eon4wd.com.au> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>Question ? how to map a track that is only wide enough for a motor bike. There is a track width tag but it doesn?t seem appropriate.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
