On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 13:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Threads have crossed :-(, but as per their instructions that I mentioned > in the other post, the track overall is tagged to the highest > classification, so per the example they give: > > Example: Wineglass Bay, Tasmania > The technical assessment of the Wineglass Bay Lookout Walk is then > translated into plain English. NOTE: Time > is the land manager’s best estimate of the amount of time a person of > average fitness, walking in good > conditions, will take to complete the walk. Time does not describe > difficulty. Because this is a Grade 3 walk > a high/low estimate is not required > In this example the technical assessment of the components distance, quality of path, quality of markings and experience required are all Grade 1 or 2. The gradient and steps are Grade 3. Therefore, as the Wineglass Bay Lookout Walk has one or more Grade 3 components the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service have graded the walk at Grade 3. Grade 1: Distance Distance to complete walk is 2.4km. Quality of markings Clearly sign posted. Experience requires No experience required. Grade 2: Quality of path Formed track. Grade 3: Gradient Short steep hills. Time Time needed to complete track (hours/days) 1.5hrs. Steps Many steps. *Wineglass Bay Lookout walk could be described to the public as:* *Wineglass Bay Lookout Walk. Grade 3.* Symbol *Distance:* 2.4km *Gradient:* Short steep hills *Quality of path:* Formed track *Quality of markings:* Clearly sign posted *Experience required:* No experience required *Time:* 1.5hrs *Steps:* Many steps Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
