Probably worth starting a routing thread rather than merge with a specific questions on foot traffic only thread
Cheers - Phil From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2022 6:29 PM To: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au Cc: OSM-Au <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Path versus Footway On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 16:54, <osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au <mailto:osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au> > wrote: As far as I’m concerned, footway, cycleway, path(, and bridleway) are all essentially the same thing, a non-motor_vehicle path, just with different implied default access restrictions. We should probably have a discussion about how appropriate the ones listed here are: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Australia Yep! How do we handle this: https://goo.gl/maps/x39C4ky1w6S7XoLUA when motorway says bicycle=no? & similarly, you can't (at least in iD) add bike lanes to trunk roads. Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
