In the end, the only thing that counts is what is tagged on the objects in the database, and the OSM database API does not impose any restrictions about that.
I believe even iD allows you in the end to just freely specify any tags you like on any object? I’m sure it’s possible to work out some tagging scheme that adequately describes the situation you linked to. From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2022 17:29 To: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au Cc: OSM-Au <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Path versus Footway On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 16:54, <osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au <mailto:osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au> > wrote: As far as I’m concerned, footway, cycleway, path(, and bridleway) are all essentially the same thing, a non-motor_vehicle path, just with different implied default access restrictions. We should probably have a discussion about how appropriate the ones listed here are: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Australia Yep! How do we handle this: https://goo.gl/maps/x39C4ky1w6S7XoLUA when motorway says bicycle=no? & similarly, you can't (at least in iD) add bike lanes to trunk roads. Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
