>> I prefer hiking_scale:awtgs= as you know that it is a hiking scale ..
>> even if you don't know what awtgs is. >> >Fair comment. > >> Routes are a different problem .... while the worst one could be >> included .. what happens if/when things change? Possibly better to leave it off? >> Consider that some routes have alternatives, excursions... >> >One grade for the entire route, which counts the worst bits of the whole distance, plus separate grades for individual sections? > >& can we just write this up for Oz use, or do we have to go down the full path of RFC / Proposal / Voting? (Which will >undoubtedly be a Grade 5 trek! >:-)) I'm thinking "hiking_scale:awtgs=". This would have solved the problem of my well-meaning German friend deleting my tags. Since it is an Australian tag, I would have thought adding it to the Australian Wiki would be sufficient. With regard to users applying a grade using this system, how about we use a "source:grade=" tag? Maybe if the AWTGS grade has been sign-posted by the trail manager (whoever that might be), it could be "source:grade=as_signed"?? If a grade has been assigned by a user, "source:grade=user" ?? Ian
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
