Thanks, everybody, for your comments! It's always good to open another can of worms! :-)
Yes, I understand that access=no is a legal thing, but how do we distinguish between "yes you are able to but no you shouldn't"? On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 20:58, Adam Steer <adam.d.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > A little note to the discussion - the foot/ animal traffic modes = no are > crocodile related, right? > > Yes, possible. Recommended? Definitely not according to every google-able > bit of information about the place. > Yep, that's exactly what I was thinking - yes, you could easily swim across the river, but is that a good idea? :-( https://environment.des.qld.gov.au/wildlife/animals/living-with/crocodiles/croc-wise > For vehicles I think it's generally worth indicating something about > whether a ford / river needs a proper 4wd. Here I'm thinking of one I know > well, where some ways to the river are easily SUV ok - but you need great > clearance, a lot of grip and a high air intake to make the river crossing. > Yep! I've also driven across river crossings & I don't think the water has actually reached the wheel hubs, but at other times, those crossings can be 2m deep, very fast flowing & totally impassable. I hope I haven't misinterpreted the conversation... > Not as far as I'm concerned! Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
