Le samedi 13 novembre 2010 à 15:37, Jo a écrit : > Now I'll go and eradicate the child relations... after that, not sure if > I'll touch any public transport data anymore, apart from a bus stop here > or there.
Why? It is much more easier to have the common part of alternative bus routes in a single relation shared by all the alternatives. In Liège I have mapped bus route 10, there are 3 variation of this bus route: 10 Fléron http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1148168 10 Mangée http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1148170 10 Romsée http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1148169 Up to Fléron, those three are identical, so that common part is in relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1148167 which is shared by the three, further, 10 Magnée and Romsée share a small part which I have put in relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1148166 It is much easier to have it that way, if a bus stop change in the common part it must only be changed in one relation (and maybe others if the same stop is part of different routes, like 38b). I intend to do the same for other bus routes that I map (I already have a work in progress for 33 which also have alternatives (33 Vaux, 33 Trooz). -- Renaud Michel _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
