I think the only one who can take legal actions in OSM data is the OSM Foundation. As you sign their terms of service when you start using the service.
Anyway, maybe it's not a bad idea to set up the monitoring a bit more organised. I'm monitoring this bounding box: http://osm.org/?box=yes&bbox=2.89,50.87,3.29,51.01 It would be nice to gather who's monitoring which area, so we know every area is monitored. I also always check names I see for the first time, never seen real vandalism, but often seen mistakes like non-connected roads, or tagging for the renderer. Greets, Sander 2013/5/18 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> > I sent Henning the following link: > > > http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/loi_a1.pl?language=nl&la=N&table_name=wet&cn=1867060801&&caller=list&N&fromtab=wet&tri=dd+AS+RANK&rech=1&numero=1&sql=%28text+contains+%28%27%27%29%29#Art.550bis > > referring him to Art.550ter. > > I don't think we have anything more specific, although that should be > sufficient to make vandals think twice, I guess/hope. > > I tried to get a direct link to the paragraph on the French page, but > didn't succeed. > > Jo > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
