This can be done without using a relation. Multipolygons are widely
used for landuse but this is the first I see as a relation ...
If the relation would have extra meaning to it (e.g. name="De
trappistenstreek" ) it would have added value but as it stands, this is
just adding complexity without adding value. But it's allowed according
to the wiki.
Glenn
On 26-11-13 10:24, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
What do you guys think about using multipolygons for landuse?
An example here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3338083
I don't see the point of having this kind of relation. Maybe I'm
missing something.
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,
Ben Abelshausen
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
