I wouldn't have noticed the change, if it was not made by someone who has a rather bad reputation at the moment (and which I consider as "new" as well). Furthermore, the road was tagged as tertiary for 2 years by a much more experienced mapper.
this rings some alarm for me. but if it's considered OK, I don't oppose to the change regards m On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > Primary/secondary/tertiary/unclassified distinctions are not absolute for > Belgium, there is some degree of subjective judgement in that. Having said > that, N-roads are usually secondary (or primary), so I'd say that one > should have a good reason to downgrade it to tertiary, lacking that > secondary seems right. > > André Engels > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The Humbeeksesteenweg (N211a) was tagged as a tertiary road. >> Recently OsmAnd_pieter changed this to secondary. >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144119601/history >> >> Is this correct ? >> >> >> regards >> >> m >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> > > > -- > André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
