2015-02-02 12:55 GMT+01:00 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com>: > > Asking to free the toilets dataset wouldn't hurt either (they don't even >> have to do anything technically, we can just copy it from the OSM-based >> printed map and the listed addresses). >> > > Is that after they'd give their consent to do so? Or is the fact they used > OSM as the background enough to have freed that dataset? That would be very > surprising. > > That's after their agreement. Displaying different datasets on top of each other (without mixing them) doesn't trigger the share-alike clause.
> Anyway, I agree that it would be far better if we could include those > bathrooms in our data. At that point they could render a map based solely > on OSM with an empasis on what they deem important to show on such a map. I > think it's important to tell it to them that way. Maybe point them to umap > or maperitive as well. > > Jo > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
